• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
DHM Research

DHM Research

We capture people’s stories and how they're shaping yours.

  • About
    • DHM values
    • History
    • Staff
  • Research
    • Sectors & Clients
    • Custom Research
  • Services
    • Quantitative Research
    • Qualitative Research
    • Consulting
  • In the News
  • Blog
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter

Blog

DHM's research data, insights, and analysis are relied upon by clients and decision-makers wherever we work. Often, due to our deep background and insights into critical issues, DHM serves as a source for information and analysis. Check back frequently for insights into the issues of the day.

Where Are We Going? Transportation Beyond the Pandemic

In response to COVID-19 and the shelter-in-place order, Oregonians’ travel and transportation habits were forced to change. We are curious to know how Oregonians adapted their habits, what their current outlook is, and their expectations for the future.

These findings come from the fielding of the monthly DHM-OVBC Oregon Values and Beliefs Panel Survey. The online survey was conducted from May 29-June 7, 2020. It surveyed 900 Oregonians. To ensure a representative statewide sample, demographic quotas were set, and the data was weighted by area of the state, gender, age, and education. The survey’s margin of error is ±2.0% to ±3.3% depending on how the response category percentages split for any given question.

How Has COVID-19 Affected Oregonians?

COVID-19 has changed how we live. Seventy-seven percent (77%) of Oregonians reported that the pandemic has changed their daily routines. All of the changes relate to limiting the exposure and transmission of COVID-19. Respondents are purchasing masks (52%), washing their hands more frequently (73%), and avoiding physical contact with others (71%). For some, the pandemic has meant working from home (18%) and having children stay at home (18%).

Bar graph results from asking Oregon residents how their daily routines have changed due to Covid-19.

Is This the New Normal?

COVID-19 has forced Oregonians to adapt. We wanted to measure which of these changes were felt by Oregonians to be desirable, and whether they felt the change would be temporary or permanent. Oregonians perceived driving less and spending more time locally as a very desirable change (51%) but did not expect it to be permanent (10%).

Ordering goods online was not seen as desirable change (18%), but most respondents believe it will be a permanent one (59%). Oregonians appear uncertain about telemedicine. Forty-one percent (41%) of respondents see the new reliance on telemedicine as temporary, while 32% expect it to be permanent.

Stacked bar graph results from asking Oregon residents to rate the duration and desirability of behavior changes stemming from covid-19.

Will environmentally sustainable behavior stick?

We asked Oregonians how likely they would do be to behave in certain ways as the state came out of the coronavirus pandemic in order to reduce CO2 emissions. About 50% of respondents believe they are likely or somewhat likely to maintain the environmentally sustainable behaviors, with a high of 63% believing they are likely to live a simpler lifestyle and a low of 27% feeling they would work less.

Bar graph results from asking Oregon residents their level of support for allocating gas tax revenue to transportation.

Revenue generated from the gas tax is also projected to decrease and is already not keeping up with the cost of repairing roads. Given this problem, we asked Oregonians if they would be willing to fund a mileage-based user fee program as an alternate way to fund transportation.

More Oregonians oppose a mileage-based user fee program (46%) than support it (40%). Again, an important portion of Oregonians remain unsure (14%). Opponents are stronger in their opposition (29% strongly oppose) than supporters in their support (14%). The uncertainty and overall narrow difference between those who oppose and those who support these measures suggests that a strong campaign on either side of the issue could make the difference.

Bar graph results from asking Oregon residents their level of support for a mileage-based user fee program.

The results from both measures vary significantly based on political affiliation and education of the respondents. Respondents with a university degree supported both measures, 51% support for the mileage-based user fee program and 56% support for amending the Oregon Constitution and allow greater flexibility to spend gas tax revenue. This is far more than the 36% and 42% support rates for respondents with a high school diploma.

Democrats tend to support both measures, but their support appears stronger for increasing the flexibility of gas tax revenue (65%). Republicans are strongly opposed to both measures. In both cases, NAV/Other falls in between Democrats and Republicans. NAV/Other appear to be more on the side of Republicans and in opposition to the mileage-based user fee program and are squarely in between the two major parties on redirect gas tax revenue.

Stacked bar graph results from asking Oregon residents their support for transportation funding policies based on miles traveled or amount of gas purchased. Comparison by political affiliation.
Stacked bar graph results from asking Oregon residents their support for transportation funding policies based on miles traveled or amount of gas purchased. Comparison by education.

Summary

Oregonians have adapted many of their behaviors in response to COVID-19, including transportation ones. It is still unclear which of these new behaviors are here to stay and which will subside as we transition out of the pandemic. Oregonians are split on hypothetical measures to increase spending flexibility of revenue from the gas tax and the implementation of mileage-based user fee program. The future of these measures will likely come down to how NAV/Other vote and the effectiveness of the campaigns on both sides.

DOWNLOAD: DHM OVBC Transportation June 2020 Survey.pdf

Are Environmentally Sustainable Changes Here to Stay? A Complicated Picture of the Spillover from COVID-19

As a result of COVID-19, Oregonians have been forced to change how they live. A positive outcome of this has been a transition to more environmentally sustainable behavior. We are curious to know how Oregonians view these changes in behavior and their expectations regarding environmentally sustainable behavior in the future.

These findings come from the fielding of the monthly DHM-OVBC Oregon Values and Beliefs Panel Survey. The online survey was conducted from May 29-June 7, 2020. It surveyed 900 Oregonians. To ensure a representative statewide sample, demographic quotas were set, and the data was weighted by area of the state, gender, age, and education. The survey’s margin of error is ±2.0% to ±3.3% depending on how the response category percentages split for any given question.

How important do Oregonians think it is to maintain environmentally sustainable behavior following the pandemic?

A majority of Oregonians (61%) believe it is important to maintain environmentally sustainable behavior to reduce CO2 emissions as we come out of the coronavirus pandemic (importance was determined by responses of 7 and higher on a 0-to-10 scale). Thirty-one percent (31%) believe it is 10/10 important to maintain these behaviors while 10% of Oregonians believe it is 0/10 important to maintain them. The mean score for Oregonians was 6.7, indicating that most Oregonians do believe it is important to stay environmentally sustainable.

Stacked bar graph results from asking Oregon residents to rate the importance of maintaining environmentally sustainable behavior.

The results varied by the respondents’ region, gender, and political affiliation. Individuals in the Willamette Valley (Mean=6.3) believe it was less important to maintain environmentally sustainable behaviors than individuals in Tri-County (mean=7.1) and the rest of the state (mean=6.7). And, women (mean=7.2) feel it is more important than men (mean=6.2).

Bar graph results showing Oregonians’ mean rating of the importance of maintaining environmentally sustainable behavior. Separated by region.
Bar graph results showing Oregonians’ mean rating of the importance of maintaining environmentally sustainable behavior. Comparison by gender.

Predictably, the perceived importance of maintaining environmentally sustainable behaviors also varied by political ideology, with Democrats (mean=8.5) considerably more likely to say it is important than Republicans (mean=4.5), and NAV/Other (mean=6.5) fell directly in between.

Bar graph results showing mean from asking Oregon residents to rate the importance of maintaining environmentally sustainable behavior. Comparison by ideology.

Will behavior stick?

We asked Oregonians how likely they thought these new behaviors would continue following the COVID-19 pandemic. Most of the polled behaviors are considered likely or somewhat likely to continue by about 50% of respondents. Sixty-three percent (63%) believe that living a simpler life is likely to be a lasting change while just 27% of Oregonians think they will work less following the pandemic.

Bar graph results from asking Oregon residents which new behaviors would likely continue after Covid-19.

If we exclude work less, an item perceived to be not likely of continuing for most Oregonians, we can identify trends by demographic. Across the other five behaviors (stay closer to home during vacations, consuming less, living a simpler life, driving less, and flying less), the average affirmative response varies by gender, income, and political ideology.

Chart results displaying the average likely/somewhat likely scores from asking Oregon residents which new behaviors would likely continue after Covid-19. Comparisons by demographics.

Women (mean=61.8) are more likely to commit to these COVID-19 changed behaviors than are men (mean=48.4). This is consistent with the results from the importance to maintain behaviors. So, women both find it more important to maintain environmentally sustainable behaviors and report higher likelihoods of continuing new sustainable behaviors.

Similar to the gender, we again see that Republicans (mean=39.6), compared to Democrats (mean=66.2) and NAV/Other (mean=53), perceive it less likely that they will continue these new COVID-19 induced habits.

By comparing high-income Oregonians (over $100,000 a year) and low-income Oregonians (under $25,000 a year), we find that well-off respondents (mean=50.6) report that they are less likely to continue to engage in sustainable behavior than those in the low-income group (mean=59.2). This is especially important because high-income Oregonians likely changed their lifestyles more than low-income Oregonians. This may suggest that wealthier individuals are more likely to revert to the behaviors of pre-COVID days. Still, a narrow majority of the wealthy respondents reported they were likely or somewhat likely to maintain their new behaviors.

Balancing Desirability with Expectations

Respondents were asked to assess the desirability and predict the permanence of two general habits: driving less and staying in one’s local area and living simply and consuming less. Overall, respondents tended to see these new environmentally sustainable behaviors as desirable but perceived them to likely be not happening or only temporary changes.

Bar graph results from asking Oregon residents to rate the desirability of and their expectation for driving less and staying local.
Bar graph results from asking Oregon residents to rate the desirability of and their expectation of living simply and consuming less.

In both cases, just 10% of Oregonians thought these habits would become permanent changes. This is in striking contrast to the previous questions where Oregonians perceived it as likely that they would adopt environmentally sustainable behaviors.

Oregonians Support a Green Jobs Training Program

Oregonians tend to be supportive of a new Green Jobs Training Program (mean=6.8). Sixty-two percent (62%) of respondents were very supportive and just 17% were not supportive. Consistent with the other findings, Republicans remain in opposition to something environmentally friendly (mean=4.6) compared to Democrats (mean=8.6) and NAV/Other (mean=6.7). Gender also remained divided, but the gap was narrow. Females (mean=7.0) were slightly more supportive of the program compared to males (mean=6.6).

Stacked bar graph results from asking Oregon residents to rate their support for a green jobs training program.

Summary

Oregonians believe it is important to maintain COVID-19 induced environmentally sustainable behaviors and overwhelmingly support a Green Jobs Training Program. Still, it is not all good news for environmental sustainability. Although respondents report it likely that they will adopt new behaviors and believe it would be desirable for Oregonians to live simpler and more local lives, they do not see permanent changes and a new normal. Common trends of gender (women caring more than men) and political ideology (Republicans caring less than Democrats and NAV/Other) consistently influence Oregonians beliefs on environmentally sustainable matters. Overall, Oregonians support an environmentally sustainable lifestyle, but it is unclear if the new behaviors that arose out of the COVID-19 pandemic are here to stay.

DOWNLOAD: DHM OVBC Climate Change June 2020 Survey.pdf

Living with COVID-19 Reason for Optimism

DHM Research is pleased to share results of our latest COVID-19 survey. This is the second of two data releases for this survey. Key findings in today’s release include:

  • 43% of Oregonians now say the state is headed in the right direction while 38% feel that it is off on the wrong track. The right direction percentage is down from 56% in April.
  • Oregonians are feeling a mixture of optimism and pessimism about the future. On the positive side, 57% report that most days they feel that there are valuable lessons to be learned from COVID-19. But on the negative side, 53% also report that most days they feel that we won’t learn from COVID-19 or change our behaviors.
  • Many Oregonians believe that some changes we’ve experienced due to COVID-19 will become permanent, including increased online shopping (59%), remote working (46%), and, worryingly, persistently high unemployment (26%).
DOWNLOAD: DHM COVID-19 Summary Memo & Toplines
DOWNLOAD: DHM COVID-19 Survey Crosstabs

Is the Worst Behind Us? An Update on the Economic Outlook of Oregonians

  • 63% of Oregonians rate the state’s economic conditions as poor or very poor. This is up from 55% in March.
  • Although Oregonians are growing more concerned about the state of the economy, they have become less worried about their own personal financial situations. Now, 49% say that they are somewhat or very worried about their financial situation, which is down from 63% in March and 56% in April.
  • Oregonians are becoming increasingly divided about opening up the economy. Given the choice 40% said it is urgent to open up the economy while 55% said it is not safe yet. Opinions vary starkly by political party with 66% of Republicans saying that opening is urgent compared to just 16% of Democrats.

Additional findings in the survey include the percentage of Oregonians who expect need help paying for everyday basics and housing, current attitudes on taxes and public spending, beliefs about longer-term changes about work, driving and personal consumption.

DOWNLOAD: DHM COVID-19 Summary Memo & Toplines
DOWNLOAD: DHM COVID-19 Survey Crosstabs

Oregonians oppose releasing people from jails and prisons to meet COVID-19 social distancing guidelines.

Infographic including bar graph results from asking Oregon residents if they support releasing various groups of people from jails and prisons.

DHM Research conducted its second survey of Oregonians about COVID-19. This is the third of three data releases from this survey. Key findings in today’s release includes:

Releasing people from jails and prisons

  • Oregonians strongly oppose (68% oppose) a general release of people from jails and prisons to meet COVID-19 social distancing guidelines. A majority (56%) also oppose releasing inmates because they are medically fragile.
  • Oregonians are split about whether to release inmates from Oregon’s jails and prisons who have less than 12 months remaining on their terms or who are deemed low risk to the community.

Experiences and opinions about the healthcare system

  • 3 in 10 Oregonians have had the treatment of an important health issue delayed because it is not considered essential during the COVID-19 outbreak.
  • A majority (59%) believe Oregon’s hospitals have capacity for the number of people expected to need care for COVID-19.

The typical Oregonian expects that it will take another two months before it is safe to go to the doctor’s office for routine care and three months to have surgery at a hospital.

The research was completed as a community service by DHM Research in partnership with the Oregon Values and Beliefs Center. Both organizations are independent and non-partisan. DHM Research is a Certified B Corporation and OVBC is an Oregon charitable nonprofit corporation.

DOWNLOAD: Oregon COVID 2 Survey Report_data release 3 -- April 2020.pdf
DOWNLOAD: Oregon COVID Survey 2--Tables--Data Release 3.pdf
DOWNLOAD: Oregon COVID Survey 2_data release 3--Annotated--April 2020.pdf

Oregonians expect it to take months before they feel safe returning to normal activities

Infographic including bar graph results from asking Oregon residents how long they expect it’ll take to safely return to certain activities.

DHM Research conducted its second survey of Oregonians about COVID-19. This survey focuses on their opinions about when it will be safe to return to normal activities and the criteria people will use when making that decision.

This is the second of three data releases from this survey. Key findings in today’s release include:

  • Oregonians expect it to take months before they feel safe returning to normal activities.
  • Oregonians put the most trust in public health officials when deciding if it is safe to return to normal activities. Trust in Governor Brown and President Trump is lower and much more partisan.
  • Oregonians will be reluctant to return to normal activities until widespread testing is available and there is a low rate of new COVID-19 infections.
  • Oregonians support the state reporting positive COVID-19 cases at multiple levels, such as by zip code and specific nursing home facilities.
  • Large numbers of Oregonians would not immediately self-isolate if they learned they were in contact with a COVID-19 positive person.

The final data releases will focus on Oregonians’ opinions and experiences with the healthcare system, and their support for releasing people from jails and prisons to manage potential COVID-19 outbreaks.

The research was completed as a community service by DHM Research in partnership with the Oregon Values and Beliefs Center. Both organizations are independent and non-partisan. DHM Research is a Certified B Corporation and OVBC is an Oregon charitable nonprofit corporation.

DOWNLOAD: Oregon COVID 2 Survey Report_data release 2 -- April 2020.pdf
DOWNLOAD: Oregon COVID Survey 2_data release 2--Annotated--April 2020.pdf
DOWNLOAD: Oregon COVID Survey 2--Tables--Data Release 2.pdf

Survey shows that Oregonians overwhelmingly support the state’s stay at home orders

Infographic including pie chart results from asking Oregon residents if they support stay at home orders. Also includes bar graph comparing responses by political affiliation.

DHM Research conducted its second survey of Oregonians about COVID-19. This survey focuses on their opinions about the state’s stay at home orders and the conditions that they think need to be met to allow businesses, schools and other places to reopen.

The results are clear that Oregonians’ support the stay at home orders, and that support is broad across all areas of the state and political affiliations. The survey also shows that the most important conditions to meet before reopening are widespread COVID-19 testing with declining positive cases, sufficient hospital capacity, and the availability effective treatments.

This is the first data release for the survey. Upcoming data releases will focus on when Oregonians believe that it will be safe to return to normal activities, their opinions and experiences with the healthcare system, and support for releasing people from jails and prisons.

The research was completed as a community service by DHM Research in partnership with the Oregon Values and Beliefs Center. Both organizations are independent and non-partisan. DHM Research is a Certified B Corporation and OVBC is an Oregon charitable nonprofit corporation.

DOWNLOAD: Oregon COVID 2 Survey Report_data release 1 – April 2020
DOWNLOAD: Oregon COVID Survey 2_data release 1 – Annotated – April 2020.pdf
DOWNLOAD: Oregon COVID Survey 2 – Tables – Data Release 1.pdf

Survey Results: Oregonians’ Response to Coronavirus

DHM Research conducted this survey to benefit Oregonians and public leaders as we all continue to address the coronavirus outbreak. We recognize that this is a quickly developing situation and that attitudes will continue to be shaped by events. Therefore, we present these findings as both a guidepost for moving forward and as an historical document indicating where have been.

Read More

DOWNLOAD: DHM COVID-19 Survey Toplines
DOWNLOAD: DHM COVID-19 Survey Crosstabs

American Justice: Another Partisan Issue

DHM Panel January Survey Results

February 28, 2020

Like many other issues, Oregonians’ opinions about the justice system are growing more and more partisan. Whether we trust the FBI, Supreme Court, or our local police department, is now more closely related to how we identify politically than anything else.

These findings come from the January 2020 fielding of our DHM Panel. The survey was conducted from January 28 to February 4, 2020 and surveyed 552 Oregonians. The results were weighted by age, gender, area of the state, political party, and level of education to ensure a representative sample of Oregon residents. The margin of error for this survey is ±4.17%.

Oregonians are divided about several aspects of the justice system.

DHM Panelists rated their level of confidence in several aspects of the American justice system. They reported the highest levels of confidence in their local police department, with 74% saying that there are very or somewhat confident. This was followed by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), with 67% confidence. However, even at these relatively high levels, between 23%–44% of Oregonians lack confidence in key law enforcement agencies. These are notably high percentages considering the level of power we grant these agencies.

Among the agencies tested, Oregonians have the least confidence in the US Supreme Court. Only a slim majority (54%) said that they are confident in the Supreme Court, with 44% not confident.

0220BP1

Oregonians’ confidence in the FBI and the Supreme Court has declined as these agencies have been tied to intense political battle.

The FBI became wrapped up partisan politics in 2016, when many Democrats were angered by the way it handled the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s emails; Republicans have frequently complained about its role investigating Russia’s election interference.

The politization of the Supreme Court goes back further than 2016, only intensifying when the Senate denied hearings for President Obama’s Supreme Court nominee and when President Trump made two appointments to the Court.

Consequently, Oregonians’ are now less confident in both the FBI and Supreme Court. And more significantly, Democrats and Republicans opinions have diverged.

Since 2016, between 60%–68% of Oregonians have reported being confident in the FBI. However, what looks like relative stability masks large changes in attitudes by party. In 2017, the partisan gap was just one percentage point. By 2019, it grew to 41 points. It moderated in 2020 and now sits at 17 points, with 73% of Democrats confident compared to 57% of Republicans.

Oregonians’ confidence ratings of the Supreme Court have fallen from 57% in 2017 to 52% in 2020. However, feelings among Democrats and Republicans have moved in opposite directions. Confidence has increased by 16 points among Republicans (55% to 71%) but has fallen a whopping 34 points among Democrats (66% to 32%).

0220BP2

Confidence that our justice system is fair to all is key to a successful democracy. The diversion in confidence that Democrats and Republicans have in federal law enforcement and courts should concern us all.

DOWNLOAD: DHM Panel Blog Post February 2020: Justice

An OK Time to be Alive

DHM Panel December Survey Results

January 21, 2020

As the 2010s wrapped up and we headed into a new decade, we are curious to know what Oregonians think of previous decades and what their expectations are for the decade to come.

These findings come from the December 2019 fielding of our DHM Panel. The survey was conducted from December 11 to 17, 2019, and surveyed 564 Oregonians. The results were weighted by age, gender, area of the state, political party, and level of education to ensure a representative sample of Oregon voters. The margin of error for this survey is ±4.13%.

Looking back, Oregonians think most fondly of the 50s, 80s, 90s, and 2010s. They agree that the past decade was better for some groups of people than others.

When asked to reflect on previous decades, Oregonian’s shared clear preferences. While 18% answered that they were unsure, favor was distributed almost evenly between the 1950s, 1980s, 1990s, and the 2010s.

BP1

While the 2010s were one of the decades viewed more positively by Oregonians, they believe that this decade was better for some groups of people than for others. About one-half of Oregonians believe the 2010s were better for women and people of color than previous decades. A majority of Oregonians, almost seven in ten, feel that this past decade was worse for the middle class and for children growing up during this time, than in previous decades.

BP2

Just over one-quarter of Oregonians are unsure whether this past decade was better or worse for whites and men.

In general, Oregonians are not too optimistic about the next decade.

When thinking generally about the future of our state, 63% of Oregonians expect conditions to either stay the same or worsen. Fewer are optimistic, expecting things in the state to improve in the next ten years (29%).

BP3

Though Oregonians may not be too optimistic about the upcoming decade, most do not agree that Oregon’s best days are behind us (44%).

BP4

Oregonians are divided in their opinions of the current economic conditions those of the recent past. Few expect them to improve.

When asked to reflect on the overall economic conditions in the past decade as well as the current economic conditions in the state of Oregon, responses were mostly consistent between the two. A slight majority lean negative in their perceptions of the current conditions (50%) and those of the recent past (56%).

BP5

Oregonians also lean negative when asked to predict the economic conditions in Oregon ten years from now. One-quarter think the conditions will remain the same, and 43% expect conditions to worsen.

BP6

Though Oregonians tend to be pessimistic about the future of our state, they still remain hopeful in some areas. When asked what they are most hopeful for in 2020, Oregonians shared a wide variety of answers, some of which can be seen below.

BP7
DOWNLOAD: DHM Panel Blog Post January 2020 Reflections
  • « Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Next »

"Over many years, I’ve worked with DHM on virtually every type of research as a client, a consultant, and a project partner in such wide-ranging sectors as utility taxes, land conservation community giving and the judiciary. Regardless of circumstance and without exception they've been deep thinkers from the start and deliver unimpeachable work, exceptional analysis, and invaluable insight."

Paul Vogel Principal, Vogel Communications

Footer

Location

Portland Office
503-220-0575
555 SE Martin Luther
King Jr. Blvd
Suite 105
Portland, OR 97214

Seattle Office
206-795-7415
119 First Avenue
Suite 460
Seattle, WA 98104

 

Contact Us

We welcome you to reach out to our team. We’ll be in touch with you shortly.

Send us a note.

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2022 DHM Research, LLC | Privacy Policy